Love the Philippines

Indicator worth a closer look. Not an accusation or a finding of wrongdoing.

Ito ay istatistikong anomalya o indikador na dapat suriin — hindi patunay ng maling gawain, pandaraya, o katiwalian laban sa sinumang tao.

AI-verified / Na-verify ng AI Data as of October 21, 2026

Duplicate or Near-Duplicate Projects

Very similar descriptions within ~100m or identical coordinates across contracts/years.

This is a statistical anomaly or indicator worth examining — not proof of wrongdoing, fraud, or corruption against any person.

Indicator: contracts 22DB0022 and 22DB0030 have near-identical descriptions at the same coordinates (funding year 2022; ₱49.00M, ₱49.00M). Worth checking whether they cover the same works. One project may be a continuation or second phase of the other, but the first contract does not specify this.

Public record entityConstruction of Seawall at Barangay Sinisian East, Lemery, Batangas
LocationLEMERY (BATANGAS), BATANGAS, Region IV-AContract 22DB0022
Amount₱49,000,000.00 sumbong source

Only contractors and government agencies named in public procurement records are shown. Private individuals are not named.

Satellite before / after

Loading satellite imagery…

Named in this indicator? Respond or report an error · Corrections policy

Project completion

Schedule fields from DPWH transparency portal records and the Sumbong sa Pangulo flood-control list — not inferred beyond those columns.

Reported complete (DPWH): 1Ongoing: 0Delayed: 0Status unknown: 0
ProjectProg.Target endActual endDays lateStatus
Construction of Seawall at Barangay Sinisian East, Lemery, Batangas22DB0022Flood control100%December 7, 2022December 7, 2022—completedsumbong source

Start: February 11, 2022 · Source fetched October 21, 2026

Rule Definition

Title similarity + distance or shared coordinates within municipality.

Triggering Data & citations

Identical coordinates shared by multiple contracts

{
  "contractId": "22DB0022",
  "coordinates": {
    "lat": 13.907326,
    "lon": 120.85731
  },
  "otherContracts": [
    "22DB0030"
  ]
}

Possible Innocent Explanations

  • Multi-component contracts sharing a single pin
  • GIS centroid placement