Schedule / Date Inconsistencies
Completion before start, implausible duration for cost, or future dates marked complete.
This is a statistical anomaly or indicator worth examining — not proof of wrongdoing, fraud, or corruption against any person.
Indicator: contract 24OE0042 (₱144.75M) is recorded as completed in 69 days against 149 planned; similar-cost projects take a median of 377 days, putting it in the fastest 0.6%. The contractor may have deployed unusually large resources or worked in parallel to finish early.
Only contractors and government agencies named in public procurement records are shown. Private individuals are not named.
Satellite before / after
Named in this indicator? Respond or report an error · Corrections policy
Project completion
Schedule fields from DPWH transparency portal records and the Sumbong sa Pangulo flood-control list — not inferred beyond those columns.
| Project | Prog. | Target end | Actual end | Days late | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Installation of Booster Pump at Estero de Binondo (Package 1a), Manila City24OE0042Flood control | 100% | July 6, 2024 | April 17, 2024 | No target date from DPWH, so lateness cannot be computed | completedsumbong source |
Start: February 8, 2024 · Source fetched October 21, 2026
Rule Definition
Compares start, target, and actual dates from Sumbong with contract cost.
Triggering Data & citations
Contract schedule fields are inconsistent or implausible
{
"issues": [
"implausibly_short_duration"
],
"startDate": "2024-02-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"contractId": "24OE0042",
"actualEndDate": "2024-04-17T00:00:00.000Z",
"targetEndDate": "2024-07-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"contractCostPhp": 144747913.7
}Source documents
Possible Innocent Explanations
- Revised dates not yet reflected in Sumbong export
- Early completion certificate vs planned start typo