Love the Philippines
← All districts

Write your representative · FY2027 budget

Rizal (Third District)

Representative: Jose Arturo Jr. S. Garcia · bills and roles · official House profile

Served by: Rizal 2nd DEO. Committee memberships are not shown because the House has not published a machine-readable list.

Language / Wika

Tone

Lines to include

Sign it (stays in your browser; nothing is sent or saved)

Open in email
ShareFacebookXViber

We do not have a sourced email address for this office, so the email opens with the “To” field blank. Find the office’s contact details on the official House profile. Long letters are shortened in the email link; use Copy for the full text.

1 of 1 lines selected.

Hon. Jose Arturo Jr. S. Garcia
Representative, Rizal (Third District)
House of Representatives

Subject: Request for explanation and documents on FY2027 DPWH budget lines for Rizal (Third District)

Dear Representative Jose Arturo Jr. S. Garcia:

Good day. I live in Rizal (Third District), and I would like to ask about some DPWH lines for the Rizal 2nd DEO in the FY2027 budget. When I compared the National Expenditure Program (NEP) with House Bill No. 10858 (third reading), I noticed the following:

1. Construction of Bridge, Payagwan River, Barangay San Jose, Antipolo City, Rizal, 14.660900, 121.253124 (Rizal 2nd DEO): not in the NEP; ₱33,000,000 in the House version. [HB 10858 (3rd Reading) Vol. I-C, p. 544; no matching NEP line for this office]

For each line above, may I ask for:
1. The reason or basis for adding, increasing, reducing or removing it, and who requested it;
2. The feasibility study, program of work, or detailed engineering design, if one exists;
3. The exact location and the expected beneficiaries; and
4. Any earlier projects at the same location and their status.

For context, this is what public DPWH records show for past projects:
- Rizal 2nd DEO: 987 contracts (2016–2025) in public DPWH records; 832 recorded as completed and 126 as ongoing.
Some of these were marked by automated indicators on public data. These are not findings of wrongdoing; I would only like an explanation for:
- Construction of Flood Control Structure Along Upper Marikina River, Rodriguez, Rizal (22DO0010): Duplicate or Near-Duplicate Projects. https://lovethephilippines.com/projects/e76d1701-a4bd-4fb5-90be-b7694b90cdd9
- Construction of Flood Control Structure along Upper Marikina, Barangay San Isidro, Rodriguez, Rizal (23DO0088): Duplicate or Near-Duplicate Projects. https://lovethephilippines.com/projects/c7a1634c-f362-4918-bfda-f8634a4c038f
- Construction of Flood Control Structure along Upper Marikina River (Phase VIII), San Mateo, Rizal (24DO0081): Schedule / Date Inconsistencies. https://lovethephilippines.com/projects/2b4f1553-5424-4f8c-a804-41f71578f73d
- Construction of Flood Control Structure along Upper Marikina River (Phase IX), San Mateo, Rizal (24DO0086): Schedule / Date Inconsistencies. https://lovethephilippines.com/projects/36644e1c-9127-4068-b837-a482101938a1

I am asking only for information and am not alleging any wrongdoing. Thank you for your time and your reply.

Respectfully,
[Your name]
[Barangay, city or municipality]

—
Sources: House Bill No. 10858, third reading, Vol. I-C (DPWH); National Expenditure Program FY2027, Vol. II-B (DBM). Data as of 2026-10-31. Page numbers are given on each line. Prepared with https://lovethephilippines.com/write-your-rep/rizal-3rd

Rizal 2nd DEO

This district engineering office also serves Rizal (Second District); Rizal (Fourth District). The budget lines below belong to the office, not to one district.

House version (HB 10858)
₱159.7M
8 lines
President’s NEP
₱126.7M
7 lines
Added by the House
1
₱33.0M
Changed / removed
0 / 0
7 lines unchanged
Lines that differ from the NEP (1)
LineChangeNEPHouseSources
Construction of Bridge, Payagwan River, Barangay San Jose, Antipolo City, Rizal, 14.660900, 121.253124Added by the House—₱33,000,000HB p. 544

Past DPWH contracts under this office

987 contracts from 2016 to 2025 in public DPWH records (₱20.76B): 832 recorded as completed, 126 as ongoing. 876 have a satellite image check on file. Browse them.

4 past contracts marked by public-data indicators

Indicators are automated statistical checks on public data. They are not findings of wrongdoing, and a marked contract may have a full explanation.

How this was made. House lines come from the native text of House Bill No. 10858, third reading, Vol. I-C (official record); every one of the 15,977 amounts was checked against its printed page. NEP lines come from the FY2027 National Expenditure Program, Vol. II-B as read by the open BetterGov DPWH NEP–HB analysis. Lines are matched by office and title. A line marked “added” had no matching title under the same office in the NEP; “uncertain” means a similar title appears in the DPWH Transparency NEP listing or our own NEP reading, or the scan reading of the NEP amount needs a check. Past contracts and indicators come from public DPWH records on this site.

Disclaimer. This page and the letters it makes ask for explanations and documents. They do not say that anyone did anything wrong. A budget change can have a good reason; that is what the letter asks about. Your name and place stay in your browser and are never sent to us.